The Square Cube Law and How It Killed Giants

We are so used to the idea of giants that we take it for granted that they exist, or must have existed at one point in our history. 
You know, those very large and very tall human-like creatures, carrying a humongous club, and being very nasty. Like this:



And if you are a typical, god-fearing Catholic Pinoy, you would swear that not only are they true, you even saw one beside that big-ass, scary-looking tree not far from your home, one night when you were going home after an evening of binge-drinking with your buddies. And the bastard’s smoking a cigar as long and as big as your leg! Or you know someone who saw one of those cigar-smoking monsters.

This creature is called a kapre—a cigar-smoking giant wearing a loincloth.

Or maybe a tikbalang—a half-man, half-horse creature about as tall as a kapre. Unlike a centaur, however, a tikbalang is a giant with the torso and arms of a man, and the head and legs of a horse. 

Scary creatures, these—and, if I may add, folktales about these creatures are awesome! (Philippine folklore is rich and very entertaining, filled with terrifying creatures straight out of your worst nightmares; Neil Gaiman has stated in an interview that his favorite Philippine mythological character is the manananggal.) 

Are these creatures possible, though? Do Kapres and Tikbalangs exist, in real life?

No. Kapres, tikbalangs, or even Cyclop and King Kong and other giant creatures are un-possible, and that’s because of this thing called “The Square Cube Law.”
A scientific principle often ignored by scriptwriters, the square cube law (first proposed by Galileo), states that when an object undergoes a proportional increase in size, its new volume is proportional to the cube of the multiplier and its new surface area is proportional to the square of the multiplier.
For example, if you double the size of a cube, its surface area is increased four times, while its volume, or weight, is increased eight times.
Alright, so imagine a perfect cube of that fruity lime-flavored gelatin dessert sitting on a plate. Let’s say the cube is 1 inch in all directions. But, seeing as how there’s always room for Jell-o, you say you want “twice as much”. So, you would be expecting a cube that is two inches tall. Twice as much, right?
Not so! It may be twice as tall, and twice as wide, but the other measurements of size have more than doubled. The surface area has been squared, and the volume has been cubed. (hence Square-Cube Law) So, going by the volume, you actually have eight times more Jell-o in a 2-inch-sized serving as you do in a 1-inch-sized serving. A serving 4 inches across would contain 64 times as much Jell-o!
This exponential growth puts a hard limit on how big your Jell-o serving can get before it overwhelms the structural integrity of gelatin. As the volume increases, so does the weight of all that Jell-o pushing down on the bottom-most layer (the mass is growing faster than the footprint, so the pressure increases) If you visualize this growing cube on your dinner table, you can picture it begin to bulge and eventually crush itself into a gooey mess.

Or think of a six-foot man, who suddenly became twice as big. His surface area is quadrupled, and his weight is increased eight times. With all that weight, he wouldn’t be able to stand on his own legs, because although they may have become twice as long and four times as wide, his weight in the meantime became eight times heavier. He wouldn’t be able to stand, much less chase anybody around. His legs would snap off.

The evolutionary biologist J. B. S. Haldane, in his essay On Being the Right Size,discusses proportions in the animal world and the essential link between the size of an animal and these systems an animal has for life.”
The bigger an animal gets, the more would they have to change their physical shape, but the weaker they would become. There is a reason why an elephant is shaped that way, or why a mouse (and other creatures of that size) has that kind of bone structure.  
So, giant ants, giant scorpions, etc. does not, and would not, exist. Billions of years of evolution have determined the correct size for them.

Read more about the Square Cube Law:




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Vincent

86-Year Old Man Tells His Life Story

From Cross-stitching to Explosions